APP.COM TUESDAY, MARCH 19, 2024 9A LI IT TIM ON LY Spring SALE FREE INSPECTION ESTIMATE GOOD FOR A FULL YEAR CALL TODAY! approved credit. Terms Conditions apply, see website for full details. HGE is fully licensed and insured. MD License DC License VA License BEFORE AFTER STAR RATING Reviews 4.8 STAR RATING Reviews 4.9 TOP INDUSTRY CERTIFICATIONS ROOFING SIDING WINDOWS GUTTERS INSULATION 833-551-7802 908-524-0206 8 DAYS HIGHLIGHTS OF THE AMALFI COAST Discover one of the most fascinating andromantic destinations in the world 8 DAYS Provence Cycle and Wine in France Journey through the most beautiful villages in France with exceptional local wines 8 DAYS NATURAL HIGHLIGHTS OF COSTA RICA Jungles, mountains and coast: Costa Rica is anatural paradise 9 DAYS HIGHLIGHTS OF ANCIENT GREECE See some of the most significant archeological sites in the world, including the Acropolis, Mycenae and Olympia. EXPLORE THESE OTHER POPULAR DESTINATIONS Do you know where the best bucket list destinations are? EXODUS DOES.
$200 OFF ON YOUR ADVENTURE PROMO CODE: 200X2024 Conditions Apply, Cannot be combined with any other offer. Please use code at the time of reservation THE LEADER IN ADVENTURE TRAVEL Plus the security and safety of small group, expert guided tours WASHINGTON The National Association is battling New York state regulators at the Supreme Court over their reaction to mass shootings, which threatened to choke insurance and lending to the gun advocacy group. The case about the Second Amendment right to bear arms. about the First Amendment right to free speech. The eventual judgment is likely to how far government can go in voicing opinions about the businesses they regulate.
The NRA contends that New powerful Department of Financial Ser- vices coerced insurers to stop doing business with the group because cials like its gun advocacy. A half-dozen current and former prosecutors warned the position could weaken enforcement and over- whelm the courts with lawsuits. For ex- ample, many of the more than 1,000 people charged in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot asked to dismiss their charges on First Amendment grounds by arguing their actions were the result of believing the 2020 election was stolen. If the Su- preme Court rules for the NRA, those defendants could start suing prosecu- tors.
The Justice Department has weighed in because depending how the court rules the justices might complicate the enforcement of laws and regulations. U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar take sides in the case. But she ar- gued even if state went too far in discouraging insurers and banks from doing business with the NRA, the case should be decided narrowly to avoid disrupting other regulators. The justices were slated to hear oral arguments Monday.
Critics: The case concerns two sets of ac- tions: one targeting a insurance policy, one addressing banks and insur- ers more broadly. In April 2017, the NRA, which is head- quartered in New York, began market- ing insurance policies to cover expenses from using a legal arm in self-defense. Some critics called the policies Carry Guard policies were administered by Lockton and underwritten by insurers Chubb and of London. The Department of Financial Ser- vices began investigating in October 2017. The department can grant or deny licenses, launch investigations, impose millions of dollars in and refer mat- ters for criminal prosecution.
Chubb and Lockton suspended the Carry Guard program the next month. In February 2018, after the Parkland shooting, criticism rained down on the NRA, including from then-New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Maria Vullo, the superintendent of the ser- vices department. Vullo began meeting with insurance executives who did business with the NRA. What was said is disputed, but of London de- cided to stop underwriting lated policies that month and to scale back its business with the NRA.
The NRA sued Vullo, claiming she her regulatory muscle to punish the organization for its First Amend- ment-protected speech and to suppress its future Under Supreme Court precedents, government may express their opinions under the First Amendment, but they cannot tempt to A U.S. District Court judge dismissed most of the claims, but allowed the group to continue Vullo over allegations she violated the First Amendment by coercing insurers to stop doing business with the NRA. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled out even those claims, the NRA failed to plausibly allege unconsti- tutional coercion. The Supreme Court agreed to hear ar- guments on whether the First Amend- ment a government to threaten regulated entities with adverse regulatory action if they do business with an advocacy Regulators: dangerous The department determined the insurance products were fully because the group lacked the necessary license.
Vullo argues the insurance programs were illegal, so forcing insur- ers to drop the coverage was a no-brain- er. Guard violated New York law in numerous brief said. provided coverage for inten- tional acts and criminal defense In May 2018, Lockton and Chubb ad- mitted to unlawfully providing insur- ance in New York and agreed to pay a collective $8.3 million. In December 2018, acknowledged violating state law and agreed to pay a $5 million The NRA agreed to pay $2.5 million and to refrain from insurance in New York for years. lawyers argue that accepting arguments would encourage law- suits for damages against government regulators and could block legitimate enforcement actions, setting excep- tionally dangerous Did a letter go too far? On April 19, 2018, Vullo sent ance to New York banks and in- surers the wake of several recent She said the against the NRA and other gun-rights groups demanding change Department encourages regu- lated institutions to review any rela- tionships they have with the NRA or similar gun promotion organizations, and to take prompt actions to managing these risks and promote public health and the letter said.
Prelogar, writing for the Biden ad- ministration, said the four para- graphs of the New York letter were fair comment under the First Amendment, simply meant to convince companies not to do business with the NRA rather than coerce them. But she acknowledged the para- graph might have gone too far in target- ing the NRA because of its viewpoint by encouraging businesses to consider from dealing with pro-gun groups. Because of disputes over what Vullo said to Prelogar said courts would have to gather more evidence be- fore deciding whether she went too far. Justices weigh if went too far The NRA, often the subject of protests such as this one in Fort Worth, is facing off against New York regulators at the Supreme Court. MAX First Amendment case involves New York, NRA Bart Jansen USA TODAY.
